we want to live the knowledge too live the content

all that is to say

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

yeah

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

not their contents

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

like first name

autonomy of learning

isaac newton

propensity within someone

i want to do that too

i really havent

isaac

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

its good

its good short few pages

god being the centre magnet

currently

Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after

dusk

, I have nothing to do, I'm watching them, trying to figure it out.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

and the fake qualifier

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

thank you