i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
i dont understand magnetisation
magnetisation/form
yeah
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
thank you
we need to be deconstructing our identities
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
as in
so an active mazelike process
much more tactility
no like which do people call me
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
hello reader,
i really havent
abrar?
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it