idk
abrar?
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
your feed looks like my tumblr
wait what is that
i really havent
yeah
the site i am dreaming
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
we can only engage in such a way
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
send link
autonomy of learning
isaac
not their contents
have you read
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
thank you
i really havent
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
division of reality is straying away from it