we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetisation/form

much more tactility

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

ion

plato

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

i dont understand magnetisation

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site

yeah

have you read

i am quite illiterate on producing technology