there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

and the fake qualifier

what do you think my name is

all that is to say

your feed looks like my tumblr

whats your name?

no i haven't really read anything

we can only engage in such a way

what do you mean

idk

is this you as well

which magnetises chains of pins

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

isaac newton

so an active mazelike process

its performative

i love it here

i want to do that too

yeah

yeah

plato

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

division of reality is straying away from it

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.

much more tactility

was it worth it

i understand

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books