i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like first name

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

isaac

so the method has to be autonomous

no i haven't really read anything

ion

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetisation/form

plato

its good

you cannot feed someone truth

have you read

not their contents

what do you mean

propensity within someone

feel you

plato

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

is this you as well

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

we need to be deconstructing our identities

its good

division of reality is straying away from it

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

abrar?

its good short few pages

sorry i am texting like a slav

autonomy of learning

its performative

all that is to say

i dont understand magnetisation

so an active mazelike process

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.