yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
and the fake qualifier
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i was tempted to lie about my name
lol yea
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
is everyoneback on tumblr now
i want to do that too
propensity within someone
like magnets
whats your name?
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i understand
its good
plato
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
barren land
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
i love it here
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
lol
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation