have you read

sorry i am texting like a slav

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetises a pin

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so an active mazelike process

no i haven't really read anything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

that looks like my instagram account

or never left

isaac

autonomy of learning

i dont understand magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

which magnetises chains of pins

division of reality is straying away from it

Picture

ion

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

It's

dusk

I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.

not so on: yvf(wthw)

...

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

...

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.