with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
and the fake qualifier
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
is this you as well
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
no like which do people call me
you cannot feed someone truth
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i was tempted to lie about my name
all that is to say
propensity within someone
like magnets
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
your feed looks like my tumblr
lol
ion
ahnaf abrar
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
no i haven't really read anything
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
so an active mazelike process
that looks like my instagram account
plato
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i want to do that too
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos