in a post. I want to be remembered

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

send your tumblr

propensity within someone

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

you cannot feed someone truth

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its good

ion

no i haven't really read anything

whats your name?

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

2 (actually index). two is company

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

like magnets

send link

i love it here

isaac newton

bro i read nothing in my life

i really havent

and the fake qualifier

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

sorry i am texting like a slav

autonomy of learning

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book