not their contents

like first name

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i understand

no i haven't really read anything

all that is to say

and the fake qualifier

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i love it here

we can only engage in such a way

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i want to do that too

as in

propensity within someone

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

your feed looks like my tumblr

wait what is that

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

feel you

the site i am dreaming

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

thank you

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

...

so an active mazelike process