it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
Thank you, Jack
hello reader,
...
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
autonomy of learning
...
not so on: yvf(wthw)
send your tumblr
so the method has to be autonomous
idk
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
all that is to say
we can only engage in such a way
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak