Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

magnetises a pin

its good

propensity within someone

abrar?

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

its performative

have you read

is this you as well

magnetisation/form

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you think my name is

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

as in

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

not their contents

Style

plato

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

Picture

currently

i want to do that too

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

not so on: yvf(wthw)

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

...