much more tactility
have you read
so the method has to be autonomous
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
plato
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
we can only engage in such a way
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
what do you mean
was it worth it
idk
magnetisation/form
like magnets
i understand
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
send your tumblr
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i dont understand magnetisation
ahnaf abrar
i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse