okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
division of reality is straying away from it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its performative
so an active mazelike process
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
was it worth it
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
propensity within someone
and the fake qualifier
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
abrar?
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
like magnets
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
in a post. I want to be remembered
which magnetises chains of pins
that looks like my instagram account
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books