okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
what do you mean
have you read
what do you think my name is
isaac newton
not their contents
ion
fw
i understand
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
send your tumblr
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good short few pages
like first name
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ahnaf abrar
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
plato
was it worth it
i have read not even 1 book
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
like magnets
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!