there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

so an active mazelike process

idk

yeah

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

its performative

propensity within someone

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i have read not even 1 book

its good

isaac

or never left

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

so the method has to be autonomous

i understand

no like which do people call me

magnetises a pin

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

Thank you, Jack