mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
much more tactility
plato
what do you mean
ahnaf abrar
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
not their contents
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i love it here
as in
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
no i haven't really read anything
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
division of reality is straying away from it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
barren land
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
and the fake qualifier
have you read
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.i see a website