no like which do people call me

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

2 (actually index). two is company

so the method has to be autonomous

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

division of reality is straying away from it

not their contents

you cannot feed someone truth

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

much more tactility

that looks like my instagram account

send your tumblr

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

send link

lol yea

the site i am dreaming

yeah

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so an active mazelike process

lol

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its performative

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

isaac

i understand

is everyoneback on tumblr now

we can only engage in such a way

i have read not even 1 book