you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i have read not even 1 book
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so the method has to be autonomous
that looks like my instagram account
we can only engage in such a way
so an active mazelike process
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
like first name
brb i will read and reply sincerely
really i want the internet
i was tempted to lie about my name
you have a beautiful account btw
so at the end
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
"Put a blanket."
idk
or never left
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i want to do that too