you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i really havent
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
so the method has to be autonomous
division of reality is straying away from it
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
all that is to say
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
that looks like my instagram account
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so an active mazelike process
much more tactility
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
magnetisation/form
its performative
no longer writing in the third person
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
its good
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
its good short few pages
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59