in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

autonomy of learning

was it worth it

division of reality is straying away from it

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

no i haven't really read anything

i see a website

all that is to say

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

like magnets

not their contents

its good short few pages

brb i will read and reply sincerely

i really havent

Can I see

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

we can only engage in such a way

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

have you read

its performative