the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
or never left
was it worth it
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
you cannot feed someone truth
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
not their contents
yeah
propensity within someone
is this you as well
whats your name?
all that is to say
sorry i am texting like a slav
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
god being the centre magnet
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.
have you read
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
it is hopeful
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
no longer writing in the third person
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
...
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."