we want to live the knowledge too live the content
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
what do you mean
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
have you read
magnetises a pin
so the method has to be autonomous
lol
magnetisation/form
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
yeah
as in
thank you
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
barren land
i really havent
no i haven't really read anything
ion
whats your name?
wait what is that
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
...
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it