i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i understand
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
have you read
no like which do people call me
i really havent
feel you
plato
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
was it worth it
much more tactility
and the fake qualifier
so the method has to be autonomous
we need to be deconstructing our identities
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
its good short few pages
...
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
barren land
ahnaf abrar
wait what is that
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities