i have read not even 1 book

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

isaac

magnetisation/form

as in

not their contents

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

sorry i am texting like a slav

i understand

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

and the fake qualifier

like magnets

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

ahnaf abrar

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

magnetises a pin

was it worth it

which magnetises chains of pins

wait what is that

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17