there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
or never left
autonomy of learning
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
idk
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
like magnets
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone truth
bro i read nothing in my life
barren land
the site i am dreaming
feel you
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
we can only engage in such a way
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
that looks like my instagram account
lol
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever