there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
autonomy of learning
you cannot feed someone truth
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
fw
division of reality is straying away from it
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
as in
so an active mazelike process
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
that looks like my instagram account
i really havent
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
idk
...
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
not so on: yvf(wthw)
...
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak