i love it here
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
13 | | | H | | | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | |
"Put a blanket."
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
or never left
idk
it is hopeful
and the fake qualifier
feel you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
i was tempted to lie about my name
all that is to say
but really the thing should be autonomous
like first name
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
its good short few pages
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i dont understand magnetisation
much more tactility