After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
autonomy of learning
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
lol
is everyoneback on tumblr now
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so the method has to be autonomous
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
yeah
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
that looks like my instagram account
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we can only engage in such a way
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
or never left
all that is to say
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
is this you as well
yeah
what do you think my name is
no like which do people call me
i understand
and the fake qualifier
was it worth it
like magnets
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt