there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good short few pages
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
...
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
yeah
its good
you cannot feed someone truth
I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.
ion
so an active mazelike process
its good
its performative
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
not so on: yvf(wthw)
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
currently
Thank you, Jack