yeah
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
isaac newton
plato
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
isaac
all that is to say
have you read
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
is this you as well
what do you think my name is
feel you
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i love it here
i want to do that too
i dont understand magnetisation
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i was tempted to lie about my name
and the fake qualifier
bro i read nothing in my life
propensity within someone
which magnetises chains of pins
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
was it worth it
division of reality is straying away from it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
like first name
you cannot feed someone truth