it is hopeful
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
thank you
like first name
its good
ion
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
isaac newton
plato
its good
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
whats your name?
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
what do you mean
lol yea
barren land
...
which magnetises chains of pins
division of reality is straying away from it
fw
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
all that is to say
and the fake qualifier
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book