Today I felt like starting

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so at the end

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

like magnets

not their contents

lol

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

thank you

fw

yeah

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

Lift Analysis

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

...

not so on: yvf(wthw)

...

your feed looks like my tumblr

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

and the fake qualifier