i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
or never left
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so an active mazelike process
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
division of reality is straying away from it
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
all that is to say
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
you cannot feed someone truth
so at the end
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
that looks like my instagram account
so the method has to be autonomous
autonomy of learning
not their contents
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
whats your name?
what do you think my name is
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
your feed looks like my tumblr
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
barren land
is this you as well
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13
its good
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
like first name
plato
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.