no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

its good short few pages

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so the method has to be autonomous

its good

magnetisation/form

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

which magnetises chains of pins

not their contents

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

god being the centre magnet

what do you mean

was it worth it

send your tumblr

is this you as well

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

as in

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

but really the thing should be autonomous

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class