bro i read nothing in my life
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
which magnetises chains of pins
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i understand
is this you as well
idk
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
lol yea
no like which do people call me
all that is to say
no i haven't really read anything
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
its good short few pages
propensity within someone
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
autonomy of learning
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i want to do that too
sorry i am texting like a slav
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
magnetisation/form