there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
much more tactility
autonomy of learning
plato
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
that looks like my instagram account
all that is to say
the site i am dreaming
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i have read not even 1 book
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
is everyoneback on tumblr now
its good
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ion
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
send link
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
your feed looks like my tumblr