not their contents
autonomy of learning
we can only engage in such a way
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
sorry i am texting like a slav
propensity within someone
and the fake qualifier
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
so the method has to be autonomous
isaac
i dont understand magnetisation
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
magnetisation/form
as in
send link
like first name
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
division of reality is straying away from it
abrar?
i really havent
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
no i haven't really read anything
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
magnetises a pin
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
all that is to say
December 2025
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.