i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

isaac

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

thank you

sorry i am texting like a slav

no i haven't really read anything

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you mean

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so at the end

your feed looks like my tumblr

or never left

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

propensity within someone

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i dont understand magnetisation

so an active mazelike process

send your tumblr

it is hopeful

idk

magnetises a pin