Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
ahnaf abrar
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
as in
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
not their contents
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
lol
or never left
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
its performative
lol yea
idk
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.