my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
yeah
or never left
lol yea
i have read not even 1 book
its good
magnetisation/form
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
division of reality is straying away from it
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
...
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the site i am dreaming
...
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
send link
idk
your feed looks like my tumblr
much more tactility
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
is everyoneback on tumblr now
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
...