what do you mean

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

so the method has to be autonomous

so at the end

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

autonomy of learning

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

not their contents

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

lol

sorry i am texting like a slav

whats your name?

its good short few pages

ion

plato

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

or never left

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.