i really havent

idk

magnetisation/form

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

as in

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not their contents

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

so the method has to be autonomous

Can I see

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

ion

was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

have you read

abrar?

IWGD

what do you think my name is

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59

i want to do that too