yeah
not so on: yvf(wthw)
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
no like which do people call me
ahnaf abrar
and the fake qualifier
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
we need to be deconstructing our identities
all that is to say
propensity within someone
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
wait what is that
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
December 2025
bro i read nothing in my life
as in