theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

and the fake qualifier

fw

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

much more tactility

i was tempted to lie about my name

magnetisation/form

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i love it here

isaac

barren land

like magnets

its good

so at the end

no like which do people call me

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

ahnaf abrar

i really havent

what do you mean

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so the method has to be autonomous

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i want to do that too

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i understand

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we need to be deconstructing our identities

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

the site i am dreaming

I Write Goodbye Letter

It Will Get Lighter

hello reader,

so an active mazelike process