all that is to say

magnetises a pin

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

propensity within someone

so at the end

that looks like my instagram account

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

its good

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason