amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
was it worth it
your feed looks like my tumblr
i understand
autonomy of learning
we can only engage in such a way
isaac
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
send your tumblr
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
as in
all that is to say
ion
its good
magnetisation/form
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
yeah
much more tactility
its good short few pages
propensity within someone