not their contents

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i love it here

autonomy of learning

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i want to do that too

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

division of reality is straying away from it

you cannot feed someone truth

isaac

so the method has to be autonomous

as in

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

like magnets

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

lol yea

much more tactility

...

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

...

so an active mazelike process

ahnaf abrar

December 2025

wait what is that

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its performative

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

like first name

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book