isaac

no i haven't really read anything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

propensity within someone

sorry i am texting like a slav

its good

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

its good

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

autonomy of learning

division of reality is straying away from it

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

not their contents

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

like first name

ion

all that is to say

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i want to do that too

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

abrar?

and the fake qualifier

feel you

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

Today I felt like starting